AI and Political Communication
WASP-HS Principal Investigator Carl Öhman, Uppsala University, reflects on his project AI and Political Communication and WASP-HS.
In short, please introduce your project
The goal of our project is to improve the current understanding of how AI and other autonomous systems reshape political communication. We interpret both AI and political communication in a rather broad sense. The former may include everything from political social media bots to various recommender systems that determine what you see on platforms like YouTube. The latter includes any form of communicative practice that is political in nature, not just that of established political parties, but also more informal ways of excreting power in the information society. This breadth lends itself to a variety of sub-projects. However, we are currently placing our main focus on emerging forms of visual communication, such as deep fakes, which offer novel opportunities for political satire, but may also reinforce existing power asymmetries and potentially even pose a threat to democratic discourse as such. Our approach is both empirical and theoretical, drawing on quantitative content analysis of deep fakes and other visual digital artifacts, as well as resources from information ethics and classical political theory.
What are your expected results, and what would you like to contribute?
Our hope is that, by the end of the project, we will have a much deeper understanding, both empirically and theoretically of the ways in which political communication is automated, and how it is shaped by the technologies that mediate it. Let me give an example. Both academic and popular discourse on political bots (and instances of AI and political communication) is largely predicated on a clear-cut distinction between “authentic” and “inauthentic” political actors (i.e., bots). Yet, increasingly we make observations that do not fall neatly into either of those categories. Consider the 2017 UK election, for instance, when a group of Labour party activists called on young left-leaning users on the dating app Tinder to donate their accounts to the activists during the final week leading up to the vote. Upon doing so, the team would connect the user’s account to a chatbot that would swipe right (indicating attraction) for every other user it encountered. When matching with others, the bot would ask for political affiliation and begin persuading those endorsing conservative candidates to reconsider. The bot is believed to have sent around 30,000-40,000 messages in the Dudley North battleground constituency alone. Though a remarkable case, this is likely a prototype of future applications of AI in political communication. Is this authentic communication? The users made an authentic choice to donate their accounts, but the texts they sent were not literally sent by the users themselves. It is hoped that our project will help assess the extent to which similar initiatives are likely elsewhere. How willing are people to donate their online personas, and to what ends? Moreover, how are we to understand and measure political participation if political content posted by real and verifiable social media accounts cannot be trusted? And how is this situation any different from other forms of political participation? These are the types of questions we hope to be able to answer by the end of the project.
What is your view of being part of WASP-HS?
I am very grateful to be part of WASP-HS. Honestly, I could not imagine a more advantageous position to be in! The long-term funding, combined with the fact that we have two doctoral students — Emelie Karlsson and Sophie Mainz — as part of the project, allows us to think big and boldly. This, I think, is an ideal situation for any researcher. Instead of the usual “publish or peril” situation that most academics face, we are actually able to sit down and think long and hard about genuinely important questions. That kind of work takes time, which is exactly what WASP-HS has given us. I would also like to stress the value of being immediately connected to a national community of AI researchers. Sometimes, research is so focused on the international arena that we forget the brilliant resources that are available just around the corner. What WASP-HS does is that it puts you in contact with those resources immediately, and in a “natural” environment. Especially for someone like myself, who does not have an academic network in Sweden, this is invaluable.
What are your expectations on WASP-HS?
My expectations for the next couple of years are high. My hopes are that WASP-HS will help forge lasting relationships with other researchers in fields different from my own. We won’t see the full effects of this yet for a couple of decades. I also hope that the doctoral students will be given the proper training required to conduct interdisciplinary research.