BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//WASP-HS - ECPv6.15.17//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://wasp-hs.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for WASP-HS
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Stockholm
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20280326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20281029T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260313T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20270117T170000
DTSTAMP:20260919T193830
CREATED:20260326T082053Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260831T080036Z
UID:21862-1773388800-1800205200@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:AI and The Paradox of Agency
DESCRIPTION:Who holds the power when AI enters our lives? AI and the Paradox of Agency is curated by  Sarah Cook\, WASP-HS Guest Professor\, and Museum Director Katarina Pierre\, and features new commissions by international artists\, from interactive games and immersive installations to sculptures and a drone-read hand-painted textile. \nThe exhibition is open between 13 March\, 2026 and 17 January 2027. \nArtists: boredomresearch\, Tega Brain\, Dennis Delgado\, Linda Dounia Rebeiz\, Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg\, Nicolas Gourault\, Zeno Gries\, Lawrence Lek\, Rachel Maclean\, Stephen Marche\, Lauren Lee McCarthy\, Florian Model\, Yuri Pattison\, Planetary Portals\, Raqs Media Collective\, Daniel Shanken\, Caroline Sinders & Romy Gad el Rab\, Paola Torres Núñez del Prado\, and Addie Wagenknecht. Curators: Sarah Cook and Katarina Pierre. \nAI and the Paradox of Agency is produced by Bildmuseet at Umeå University with support from the Jacob Wallenberg Foundation and WASP-HS (Wallenberg AI\, Autonomous Systems and Software Program – Humanity and Society). \n			\n				Read more
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/ai-and-the-paradox-of-agency/
LOCATION:Bildmuseet
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/AI-and-the-Paradox-of-Agency.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260925T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260925T103000
DTSTAMP:20260919T193830
CREATED:20260831T075814Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260915T120614Z
UID:23917-1790330400-1790332200@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:AI i välfärden – vad borde vi egentligen forska om?
DESCRIPTION:Vänligen observera att evenemanget organiseras av WASP-HS-forskare och inte av WASP-HS programkontor\n			\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				Hur kan AI användas på ett ansvarsfullt och samhällrelevant sätt? I seminarieserien ”WASP-HS Fredag: När AI möter välfärden” lyfter vi frågor som rör AI och autonoma systems påverkan på välfärden. \nDen 25 September öppnar Lupita Svensson dörren till ett nytt forskningsprojekt om AI\, ansvar och professionellt arbete – men framför allt till ett samtal. Vilka frågor uppstår där AI faktiskt används? Vad ser verksamheterna som forskningen ännu inte har fått syn på? Ta med en erfarenhet\, en fråga eller ett problem. Kanske blir det början på ett nytt forskningssamarbete. \nSeminariet är öppet för alla intresserade. Delta via länken nedan. \n			\n				Delta i seminariet\n			\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				Värd\n			\n			\n				\n				\n				\n				\n			\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n					Lupita Svensson\n					Lunds Universitet \n					\n					\n				\n			\n			\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n			\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n			\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n			\n				\n				\n				\n				\n			\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				\n				Mer om WASP-HS Samverkansarna Välfärd\nWASP-HS Samverkansarena Välfärd bidrar till att utveckla forskning som tar sin utgångspunkt i välfärdens verkliga utmaningar och utforskar hur AI och autonoma system kan användas på ett ansvarsfullt och samhällsrelevant sätt. Genom långsiktiga samarbeten bidrar arenan till att ny kunskap kan omsättas i den digitala transformation som pågår inom välfärden. Arenan skapar möjligheter för forskare och företrädare för välfärdens organisationer att tillsammans förstå komplexa utmaningar\, utveckla nya perspektiv och bidra till framtidens kunskap. \n			\n				Läs mer
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/ai-i-valfarden-vad-borde-vi-egentligen-forska-om/
LOCATION:Online
CATEGORIES:Samverkansarena,Samverkansarena välfärd
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/WASP-HS-Fredag.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260925T101500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260925T123000
DTSTAMP:20260919T193830
CREATED:20260909T124719Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260911T110707Z
UID:24231-1790331300-1790339400@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:AI in Educational Practice: Designing for Critical AI Literacy — PhD Defense
DESCRIPTION:Johanna Velander defends her doctoral thesis\, “AI in Educational Practice: Designing for Critical AI Literacy“\, at Linnaeus University on September 25. \nSee event. \nAbstract\nArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in educational practice\, yet AI literacy is often defined through predefined competencies that say less about how it is understood\, enacted\, and shaped in specific contexts. This research investigates how AI literacy is conceptualised in research and policy\, understood by teachers\, enacted through interaction with generative AI (GenAI)\, and used to inform the design of educational GenAI systems that support reflective and critical engagement. \nThe methodology combines Emergent Research Design structured with Design Research Methodology. This allows the research focus to develop in response to empirical findings\, methodological insights\, and rapid changes in the educational AI landscape\, while maintaining a coherent progression from problem clarification and descriptive inquiry towards exploratory design-oriented knowledge. Adopting a practice-oriented perspective\, the thesis synthesises conceptual\, empirical\, interactional\, and design-oriented inquiry across eight studies. \nFindings show that AI literacy is frequently framed in operational and competency-oriented terms\, while sociotechnical\, critical\, and agentive dimensions remain less developed. Teachers’ understandings of AI are often shaped by fragmented and informal learning\, although their concerns extend to trust\, responsibility\, authorship\, bias\, and pedagogical judgement. Technical understanding does not automatically lead to broader sociotechnical reasoning\, and recognising AI-related risks is not equivalent to acting critically in practice. Teacher–GenAI interaction reveals AI literacy as situated and relational: it becomes visible through how teachers delegate tasks\, interpret and adapt outputs\, question suggestions\, exercise judgement\, and negotiate responsibility. \nThe thesis further argues that literacy is increasingly bound up with machine processes. Meaning-making\, knowledge production\, and pedagogical action are no longer exclusively human activities but emerge through relations among teachers\, learners\, AI systems\, infrastructures\, and institutional conditions. This resonates with critical posthumanist accounts of literacy and shifts attention from what individuals know about AI to how humans and non-humans jointly shape what can be known and done. \nSupporting critical AI literacy therefore requires attention to both education and design. Educational GenAI systems should be evaluated not only for accuracy\, usability\, and efficiency\, but also for whether they support reflection\, surface uncertainties and question assumptions. The thesis contributes a situated account of AI literacy and an interaction-informed rationale for educational GenAI system design rather than a universal literacy framework or validated design solution. \nSupervisors\n– Marcelo Milrad\, Professor\, Linnaeus University– Nuno Otero\, Senior Lecturer\, University of Greenwich– Teresa Cerratto Pargman\, Professor\, Stockholm University \nOpponent\n– Jimmy Jaldemark\, Professor\, Mid Sweden University
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/ai-in-educational-practice-desiging-for-critical-ai-literacy-phd-defense/
LOCATION:Fullriggaren\, Ma135\, Linnéuniversitetet\, Kalmar\, Kalmar\, Sweden
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Johanna-Velander-on-color.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR