BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//WASP-HS - ECPv6.15.17//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:WASP-HS
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://wasp-hs.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for WASP-HS
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Stockholm
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260612T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260612T150000
DTSTAMP:20260825T211702
CREATED:20260611T065338Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260611T065341Z
UID:23250-1781269200-1781276400@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:PhD Defense: The Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Actor Preferences\, Bargaining Dynamics\, and Institutional Design
DESCRIPTION:On 12 June 2026\, Johannes Geith defends his doctoral thesis\, “The Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Actor Preferences\, Bargaining Dynamics\, and Institutional Design“\, at Stockholm University. \nSee event page. \nAbstract\nArtificial Intelligence (AI) poses one of the most consequential governance challenges of the 21st century. Consequently\, a range of actors\, including states\, international organizations\, and non-state actors\, recognize AI as a critical domain for strategic competition and risk mitigation. While policymakers around the world grapple with the question of whether and how to regulate AI\, the focus of attention has recently shifted to the global level. Yet to date\, we lack systematic knowledge about the patterns and drivers of global AI governance. To that end\, this dissertation provides a systematic analysis of three areas of the governance process that hold considerable promise for deepening our understanding of the global governance of AI: actor preferences\, bargaining dynamics\, and institutional design. Through four independent papers\, this dissertation makes substantive theoretical and empirical contributions to address shortcomings in prior research.  \nTheoretically\, it develops novel and testable arguments about the global governance of AI. Empirically\, it spearheads a comprehensive analysis of global AI governance through large-scale data collection efforts for each of the singular papers\, utilizing various methods for descriptive and explanatory analysis. The dissertation finds that global AI governance is characterized by three core patterns: heterogeneous actors\, institutional fragmentation\, and a predominance of non-binding rules. Two factors emerge consistently across the papers as drivers of these patterns: divergence of interests among relevant actors and uncertainty about AI. This dissertation makes contributions to three overarching bodies of literature: AI governance\, global digital governance\, and global governance. \nSee full thesis. \nSupervisors\nJonas Tallberg\, Stockholm UniversityMagnus Lundgren\, University of Gothenburg \nOpponent\nDaniel Nielson\, The University of Texas at Austin
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/phd-defense-the-global-governance-of-artificial-intelligence-actor-preferences-bargaining-dynamics-and-institutional-design/
LOCATION:Hörsal 10 (auditorium)\, Building E\, Stockholm University\, Universitetsvägen 10 E\, Stockholm\, Sweden
CATEGORIES:PhD Defence,PhD Defense
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/4.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260602T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260602T170000
DTSTAMP:20260825T211702
CREATED:20260601T072622Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260601T072625Z
UID:23002-1780408800-1780419600@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:PhD Defense: Repairing Creative AI: Critical explorations of frictions\, reconfigurations\, and reflexivity
DESCRIPTION:On 2 June 2026\, Anna-Kaisa Kaila defends her doctoral thesis\, “Repairing Creative AI: Critical explorations of frictions\, reconfigurations\, and reflexivity“\, at KTH Royal Institute of Technology. \nSee event page. \nAbstract\nThe impact of AI technologies on cultural and creative sectors and industries is expected to increase dramatically in the upcoming years. As significant uncertainties rattle the political economy of artmaking\, not all stakeholders feel their interests and concerns are equally recognised. At stake here are not only individual career prospects but the entire horizon of our envisioned cultural-technological futures.  \n\nThis dissertation examines artificial intelligence (AI) models in creative domains\, focusing on their emerging impact on the conditions and infrastructures of artistic work. It frames the transition of this socio-technical system as an instance of a broken world\, and extends Creative AI ethics beyond abstract principles towards the situated\, lived experiences of the various stakeholders involved: artists and music communities\, as well as developers and service providers of Creative AI applications. Grounded on critical analysis and ethics of care\, the dissertation explores the tensions and transitions practising artists experience in their working environments in the context of rapid AI proliferation\, and how AI development work practices could better support artists in navigating the rapidly changing socio-technical AI landscape.  \nDrawing on six empirical case studies\, the dissertation contributes\, first\, an analysis of the frictions and reconfigured conditions of artmaking\, as experienced by Nordic AI artists in the early 2020s. Second\, it introduces care ethics to the analysis of Creative AI and proposes sustained reflexive repair as a novel conceptual lens for managing disrupted cultural data relations in AI development. Overall\, the dissertation argues that foregrounding repair can make the emergent ethical impacts of AI technologies and practices visible and help reconfigure paradigms for developing\, designing\, using\, and regulating Creative AI that foster fair market conditions for artist economies and cultivate artistic integrity and agency. \n\nSee full thesis. \nSupervisors\nAndré Holzapfel\, Associate professor\, Medieteknik och interaktionsdesign Bob Sturm\, Associate professor\, Tal\, musik och hörselCecilia Åsberg\, Professor\, Linköping University \nOpponent\nBaptiste Caramiaux\, PhD\, ISIR\, Sorbonne Université\, Paris\, France
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/phd-defense-repairing-creative-ai-critical-explorations-of-frictions-reconfigurations-and-reflexivity/
LOCATION:Flodis (F3)\, KTH Royal Institute of Technology\, Lindstedtsvägen 26 & 28\, Stockholm\, Sweden
CATEGORIES:PhD Defence,PhD Defense
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Anna-Kaisa-Kaila.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260529T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260529T170000
DTSTAMP:20260825T211702
CREATED:20260527T072017Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260527T073048Z
UID:22926-1780045200-1780074000@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:PhD Defense: The Development of Complex Intelligent Systems: A Study of Engineering and Project Management Approaches
DESCRIPTION:On 29 May 2026\, Appu Balachandran defends his doctoral thesis\, “The Development of Complex Intelligent Systems: A Study of Engineering and Project Management Approaches“\, at Linköping University. \nSee event page. \nAbstract\nAdvances in software and artificial intelligence (AI) are rapidly transforming society. Many of the systems that underpin everyday life\, such as aircraft\, vehicles\, energy systems\, and transportation infrastructure\, are complex technical systems that are becoming increasingly software-intensive. As these systems gain the ability to make decisions\, learn from data\, and adapt to their environment\, they evolve into what this thesis refers to as Complex Intelligent Systems (CoIS). \nThis thesis examines how the development of such systems is changing as software and AI grow in importance\, with a particular focus on engineering and project management approaches. Traditionally\, complex systems have been developed using systems engineering\, often supported by model-based approaches to ensure structured\, traceable\, and predictable development. At the same time\, development projects have typically been organized through phase-based Stage-Gate processes. \nHowever\, the growing integration of software and AI has led to the emergence of data-driven engineering approaches and more iterative and flexible agile practices. This thesis investigates how these different approaches interact in the development of CoIS. \nThe study is based on interviews with experts from the aviation\, automotive\, and naval industries\, complemented by an in-depth case study in the automotive domain. The findings show that the development of CoIS rarely involves replacing established approaches with new ones. Instead\, organizations need to combine multiple approaches simultaneously. Model-based approaches remain essential for safety-critical systems\, while data-driven and agile approaches are required to support learning and adaptability. This creates fundamental tensions between predictability and control on the one hand\, and learning and flexibility on the other. The thesis contributes to understanding these tensions by showing that it is not only merely a practical or methodological challenge\, but rooted in fundamentally different underlying logics of development embedded in the approaches used. \nThe results also highlight the role of system architecture as a key mechanism for managing this complexity. By structuring systems appropriately\, organizations can combine different development approaches without compromising safety or functionality. Overall\, the main challenge is not choosing a single approach\, but managing the interplay between multiple approaches across both the system and the organization. \nThis thesis contributes by providing an integrated perspective on the development of CoIS and by identifying the organizational and managerial challenges that arise when different development logics intersect. As CoIS development is still evolving\, further research is needed to understand how organizations can develop the capabilities required to manage these dynamics over time and across industries. \nSee full thesis. \nSupervisors\nGunnar Holmberg\, Adj. Professor\, Linköping University (Main supervisor)Nicolette Lakemond\, Professor\, Linköping University (Co-supervisor)Gouthanan Pushpananthan\, Assistant Professor\, Linköping University (Co-supervisor)  \nOpponent\nTobias Larsson\, Professor\, Blekinge Institute of Technology.
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/phd-defense-the-development-of-complex-intelligent-systems-a-study-of-engineering-and-project-management-approaches/
LOCATION:A2\, A-building\, Campus Valla\, Linköping\, Sweden
CATEGORIES:PhD Defence,PhD Defense
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/PhD-Defense-graphic-5.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260522T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260522T170000
DTSTAMP:20260825T211702
CREATED:20260519T054225Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260519T054301Z
UID:22817-1779440400-1779469200@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:PhD Defense: Reframing Robots for Care: Situating Informal Caregivers in the Development of AI-driven Technologies
DESCRIPTION:On 22 May 2026\, Laetitia Tanqueray defends her doctoral thesis\, “Reframing Robots for Care: Situating Informal Caregivers in the Development of AI-driven Technologies”\, at Lund University. \nRead more about the event. \nAbstract\nThe current framing of AI-driven technologies situates them as solutions to a looming care crisis. However\, this overlooks informal caregivers’ key role to current State budgetary deficits impacting healthcare services happening in Europe. As States increasingly rely on informal caregivers to provide care before the necessary involvement of healthcare services\, there is already well-established research on the growing care demands on informal caregivers. Yet\, in the development of AI-driven technologies\, little attention has been given to this group. To attend to this gap\, this thesis situates informal caregivers in order to reframe current developments of AI-driven technologies for care. \nThe aims of this thesis are therefore grounded in visibilising and situating informal caregivers within the development of AI-driven technologies. This is achieved in two ways: (1) by conducting interdisciplinary research on informal caregivers to bring forth the significance of critical social sciences in Human-Robot Interaction on health care as well at times Human-Computer Interaction; and\, (2) shedding light on current societal challenges on care regarding informal caregivers\, especially informal caregivers under the age of 18 (referred to as young carers)\, to the development of AI-driven technologies. The first aim is directed at the academic community\, whilst the second aim is directed towards society by empowering specific stakeholders in envisioned AI-driven technologies as artefacts. To answer to those aims\, a socio-legal STS theoretical lens is established\, to bring forth the power of law\, social norms\, plans and situated knowledge and care. \nThe findings are based on four scientific papers\, which report on HRI research practices on health care (Paper I)\, a theoretical framework to account for norms within adaptive technologies (Paper II)\, positioning young carers into AI-driven technologies (Paper III)\, and finally\, an empirical study on young carers’ perspectives of robots for care (Paper IV). These ultimately showcase that the development stage of this technology provides a pivotal opening to include informal caregivers\, ahead of deployment. This thesis offers hope on how to attend to an overlooked stakeholder\, namely informal caregivers. This includes reflections on including a group that has previously been neglected from AI research\, namely young carers\, and how to do so ethically. \n\n\n\nSee full thesis. \nSupervisors\nStefan Larsson\, Supervisor\, Lund UniversityKatie Winkle\, Assistens supervisor\, Uppsala University \nOpponent\nSara Ljungblad\, Chalmers University of Technology
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/phd-defense-reframing-robots-for-care-situating-informal-caregivers-in-the-development-of-ai-driven-technologies/
LOCATION:Lecture Hall V:B\, building V\, Faculty of Engineering LTH\, Lund University\, Lund.\, Klas Anshelms väg 14\, Lund\, Sweden
CATEGORIES:PhD Defence,PhD Defense
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/PhD-Defense-graphic-3.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260508T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260508T170000
DTSTAMP:20260825T211702
CREATED:20260506T121806Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260506T121808Z
UID:22712-1778248800-1778259600@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:PhD Defense: Ethical Reasoning in Tech Work: From Individual Responsibility to Collective Action
DESCRIPTION:On 8 May 2026\, Kristina Popova defends her doctoral thesis\, “Ethical Reasoning in Tech Work: From Individual Responsibility to Collective Action”\, at KTH Royal Institute of Technology. \nSee event page. \nAbstract\nTechnology production is a complex process that requires the accumulation of resources and in which very little is done individually. Given the fragmentation of tech development and the limits of individual action\, how much can tech workers affect the tech they produce? Do they care about the tech they are building and its implications for the world? Who should act to ensure that technology is “ethical”? What are the possibilities for individual and collective action that exist in tech workplaces? These are the questions I aim to answer in my dissertation. \nThis dissertation is an interdisciplinary project connecting four studies with the methods from design research\, ethnomethodology and sociology. The papers are published within the fields of human-computer interaction (HCI) and computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) and positioned within the tradition of studying ethics in practice\, which approaches ethics by studying the work practices in specific tech organisations. Theoretically\, my work is grounded in the philosophical tradition of ethics of care with its focus on concrete situated actions instead of omnirelevant rules\, in the ethnomethodological tradition of respecifying theoretical phenomena as matters of practice\, and in moral anthropology with its focus on ethics as shaped by communities. \nThe four papers combined in the thesis explore the ethical reasoning of tech practitioners in academic settings\, government officials working with AI in Sweden\, and technology practitioners working in commercial companies in Europe. I rely on a variety of qualitative data: (1) a video-ethnography of design ideation sessions at the university; (2) an interview-study of ethical responsibility by tech practitioners in academia\, governmental sector and the industry; (3) a a workshop-based study of voicing discomfort (critique) in a design workshop with academic; (4) an interview-based study of ethics discourses in tech companies in Europe. The studies contribute to design and HCI with an empirical research of ethical reasoning in everyday design work. \nThe thesis aims to advance an anthropological\, human-centred take on ethics in HCI. I argue in favour of including affect and emotion of tech practitioners into the discussion on ethics in HCI and emphasise the limitations of an individualistic take on ethics. Affect is important for connecting the level of everyday practices with structural power relations. Understanding the limitations of individual action and focusing on the potential for collective action instead is important for balancing responsibility with power. This thesis also draws attention to the inequality within the tech sector as a factor that hinders the possibility for forming a shared agenda and engaging in collective action. \nSee full thesis. \nSupervisors\nRobert Comber\, Associate Professor.Airi Lampinen\, Professor at Stockholm University.Kristina Höök\, Professor at KTH Royal Institute of Technology.  \nOpponent\nKatie Shilton\, Professor at University of Maryland\, College Park\, Maryland\, US
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/phd-defense-ethical-reasoning-in-tech-work-from-individual-responsibility-to-collective-action/
LOCATION:Q2\, KTH Royal Institute of Technology\, Malvinas Väg 10\, Stockholm\, Sweden
CATEGORIES:PhD Defence,PhD Defense
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/PhD-Defense-Kristina-Popova.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260508T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260508T120000
DTSTAMP:20260825T211702
CREATED:20260501T080056Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260504T073553Z
UID:22598-1778234400-1778241600@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:PhD Defense: Emerging AI and Ethics in Higher Education: A Technology Mediation Perspective
DESCRIPTION:On 8 May 2026\, Alexandra Farazouli defends her doctoral thesis\, “Emerging AI and Ethics in Higher Education: A Technology Mediation Perspective”\, at Stockholm University. \nSee event page. \nAbstract\nThe emergence of AI has become a defining issue for higher education worldwide\, and Sweden is no exception. At the same time\, emerging AI technologies reconfigure priorities and valuations within educational practice by mediating teaching and learning and opening new paths for how teachers and students relate to higher education practices. In this context\, AI-mediated practices raise ethical questions that are often presented as unprecedented yet are deeply rooted in longstanding practices in higher education. This thesis undertakes an empirical exploration of AI-mediated practices in higher education\, foregrounding teachers’ perspectives and focusing on the ethical issues arising from such mediations. Drawing on postphenomenology and technology mediation theory\, the thesis examines how teachers perceive and experience emerging AI artefacts (automated grading systems (AGS) and generative AI (GAI) chatbots) in relation to their practices\, and how these artefacts mediate their understandings of what they ought to do and how they ought to act when balancing sometimes competing demands of autonomy and accountability. \nThe thesis is a compilation of four complementary studies. Study I examines the ethical considerations of AGS\, reviewing the literature on AGS and analysing their specificities through a relational ethics approach. This study highlighted that AGS not only introduce technical and procedural considerations but also reconfigure educational practices and relationships in ways that demand ongoing\, situated\, and relationally attuned ethical reflection. Study II is an interview study with AGS developers who are also university teachers using these systems. It examines their expectations\, experiences\, and the disruptions that AGS introduce into assessment practices. The findings underscore the ambivalent role of AGS as both promising and disruptive\, offering efficiency and consistency\, but also introducing ‘new’ frictions and ethical dilemmas. Study III is a study inspired by the Turing test\, followed by focus group interviews with university teachers. It explores how GAI chatbots mediate teachers’ perceptions of their assessment practices. The findings indicate that the presence of GAI chatbots\, allowing the possibility of AI-generated writing\, shapes evaluation practices\, prompting teachers to question authorship and\, in some cases\, reinforcing mistrust within the student–teacher relationship. Study IV is a focus group interview study examining how teachers experience and interpret the emergence of GAI and how it mediates their perceptions of their professional roles. Participants described GAI as both disruptive and potentially transformative. They were compelled to reconsider assessment formats\, teaching priorities\, and their responsibility to foster critical and ethical engagement with technology. \nThe combined findings of the four studies show that the emergence of AI unsettles established practices and intensifies the uncertainties that characterise educational situations\, placing greater demands on teachers’ professional judgment. The thesis also argues that the emergence of AI exposes and amplifies longstanding ethical issues\, such as fairness\, academic integrity\, and equity\, reshaping how these issues are understood and enacted as the technologies become embedded in higher education practices. \nSee full thesis. \nSupervisors\nCormac McGrath\, Associate Professor\, Department of Education\, Stockholm University.Teresa Cerratto Pargman\, Professor\, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences\, Stockholm University.Klara Bolander Laksov\, Professor\, Department of Education\, Stockholm University. \nOpponent\nWayne Holmes\, Professor\, Institute of Education\, University College London (UCL).
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/phd-defense-emerging-ai-and-ethics-in-higher-education-a-technology-mediation-perspective/
LOCATION:Lilla hörsalen\, Naturhistoriska riksmuseet (The Swedish Museum of Natural History)\, Frescativägen 40\, Stockholm\, Sweden
CATEGORIES:PhD Defence,PhD Defense
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/PhD-Defense-graphic.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260306T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20260306T170000
DTSTAMP:20260825T211702
CREATED:20260306T121125Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260309T152317Z
UID:21401-1772784000-1772816400@wasp-hs.org
SUMMARY:PhD Defence: Figuring the Boundary Between Human and Robot
DESCRIPTION:On 6 March 2026\, Dominika Lisy defends her doctoral thesis\, “Figuring the Boundary between Human and Robot: A Feminist New Materialist Perspective on Dermally Layered Relationality”\, at Linköping University. \nSee event page. \nAbstract\nSocial robots are expected to become ubiquitous across different areas  of both the private and public spheres of human life\, assisting in care\, education\, and daily tasks. Hopes for meaningful\, efficient\, and enjoyable interactions with these kinds of robots drive social robotics research\, but there are also ethical concerns and critiques concerning negative social consequences. Both sides involve assumptions about the boundaries around what it means to be human in relation to the non-human. In order to disentangle optimistic and pessimistic notions about this relationality\, there needs to be a reconsideration of how the boundaries constituting the human/non-human divide are understood and figured in encounters with robot bodies. Following Dominika Lisy’s personal experiences that have been documented as reflections\, diary entries\, and by photographing moments of meeting different social robots\, this thesis starts at the first point of contact: the skin. \nBut how might the skin be used to rethink boundaries between humans and social robots? The research in this thesis illustrates an interdisciplinary endeavour to weave together insights from feminist theory and methodology\, research on affective and tactile robots\, and the biology and neurophysiology of the skin. Grounded in feminist new materialism\, which embraces the entanglement of matter and discourse\, the thesis develops a figuration of the skin through which both the form and content of the thesis’ text illustrate what it means to pay attention to boundaries during encounters with affective and tactile robots. Figuring boundaries in this way\, they can be described as multilayered\, flexible yet sturdy\, hardening over time\, and dependent on un/noticeable sensations\, just like the skin. This thesis aims to contribute to feminist theories of human/non-human relationality. \nThe thesis presents a situated feminist account of making sense amidst diverse knowledges through the skin and personal embodied experiences in order to develop a sensitivity and ethical responsibility for human–robot relations. \nSee full thesis. \nSupervisors\nKatherine Harrison\, PhD at Linköping UniversityHarald Wiltsche\, Professor at Linköping University \nOpponent\nMaaike Bleeker\, Professor at Utrecht University
URL:https://wasp-hs.org/event3/phd-defence-figuring-the-boundary-between-human-and-robot/
CATEGORIES:PhD Defence,PhD Defense
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://wasp-hs.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Dominika_Lisy_PhD_Defense.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR